[11:20] <titus.tallang> application on the primary gun or on the salvo?
[11:21] <titus.tallang> primary gun should apply better than before in all cases, if it doesn't that's a bug
[11:32] <tinkerhell> The salvo
[11:32] <tinkerhell> The gun seems better, but the salvo just seems borked. Was hitting a rattleanake for 1.3k with the salvo :/
[11:33] <ccp_fozzie> how fast was the rattlesnake moving?
[11:34] <tinkerhell> Full speed unwebbed with no prop
[11:37] <ccp_fozzie> you'll have a little bit of damage reduction from speed then, and no damage reduction from sig radius
[11:38] <ccp_fozzie> the big difference is that the volley has been decreased a lot (-40% base damage per shot) and the cycle time sped up
[11:40] <ccp_fozzie> it does a lot less damage per shot, a bit less damage per second while it has charges, and can do a bit more damage before needing to be recalled and reloaded (thanks to more charges)
[11:45] <tinkerhell> Well looks like we are going to have to use dromi alot more now :p
[11:52] <tinkerhell> Doesnt the fighter bomber have better explosion radius and velocity on its main guns than the light fighters salvo now? Is it going to stay like that?
[15:08] <ccp_larrikin> @here https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5960333 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5960333 [cc: focusgrouplogbot]
[15:26] <ccp_larrikin> or the correct link > https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6536729#post6536729 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6536729#post6536729
[16:06] <jezza_mcwaffle> On the subject of EWAR changes on the FAX's and Dreads (I'll go over cap boosters later) has the change to remote ewar (so remote sebos and tracking computers etc) been reduced to 70% respectively to match the sensor damp and tracking disruption resistance in Siege / Triage? Are you happy keeping that at 80%
[16:10] <jezza_mcwaffle> And with the new caps what are you expecting prices to 'settle' to?
[17:39] <scott_ormands> Larrikin, a few days ago someone posted their math on the buikld cost for the vanquisher to be over 1.2 T is that just prerelease numbers or are you actually looking to make them cost that much?
[17:39] <scott_ormands> https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4ofo5s/sisi_thats_an_expensive_titan_vanquisher_blueprint/
[17:40] <scott_ormands> http://i.imgur.com/wJAzJWh.png
[17:42] <scott_ormands> ignore me sorry i misread that 300b not 1.2T
[18:15] <titus.tallang> 300b isn't that far off the usual t1-faction ratio, tbf?
[18:16] <titus.tallang> also, are there any changes coming to availability of faction capital modules?
[18:16] <titus.tallang> considering how ridiculously out of whack supply vs demand seems to be for these
[18:45] <titus.tallang> ccp_larrikin: first reaction, _They destroyed a man who would have revolutionized the science and application of neural boosters._ is like really underwhelming for a quote
[18:45] <titus.tallang> turn the second part into something a bit more...impactful, will you? :stuck_out_tongue:
[23:18] <scott_ormands> yeah, i dont have a problem at all with the 30b price